1200

THE GASTROSCOPY RATE OF CLEANLINESS EVALUATION (GRACE) SCALE: TIME TO ESTABLISH A GRADING SCALE FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; A RELIABILITY AND VALIDATION STUDY

Date
May 21, 2024
Explore related products in the following collection:

Aims: to develop and validate a new scale for mucosal visualization of the upper gastrointestinal tract during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), the Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE), as a quality standard tool through the application of a standardized, reliable, and validated scoring system.
Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted in a multicenter international study. The GRACE scale is based on the evaluation of three different anatomic areas (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) with 4 different grades of cleanliness (from 0-worst to 3-excellent). A score of 0 to 3 was assigned to each segment and then summed up for a total score ranging from 0 to 9 (Figure 1). In the first phase, four expert endoscopists evaluated 60 selected images twice with a two-week interval; in the second phase, the same 60 images were scored twice again with a two-week interval by one expert and one non-expert endoscopist from 27 different Endoscopy Departments Worldwide. For reproducibility assessment and clinical validation, in a third phase, the same mix of experts and non-expert endoscopists performed a real-time application of the scale on consecutive patients undergoing gastroscopy in their own center, and the evaluations were compared with the original experts. Intra-rater reliability was assessed by Fleiss kappa, Inter-rater reliability by Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and perclass agreement by k for individual categories; for these assessments, almost perfect agreement was defined as >0.80.
Results: in the first phase, the intra-rater Fleiss kappa was 0.89 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.81-0.97], whilst the inter-rater ICC was 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) for single measures. In the second phase, 27 centers and 54 endoscopists participated (27 experts, 27 non-experts). The overall intra-rater Fleiss kappa was 0.85 (95% CI 0.83-0.87): between experts 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.86) and between non-experts 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91), whilst the inter-rater ICC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) for single measures. The perclass analysis for scores 0, 1, 2 and 3 were: 1.00, 0.94, 0.87 and 0.93 in the first phase, and 0.97, 0.89, 0.85 and 0.92 in the second phase, respectively.
In the third phase, 1008 images were evaluated: the inter-rater ICC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.87) for single measures.
Conclusions: the GRACE scale for esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed almost perfect results in terms of reproducibility, in intra-rater, inter-rater reliability and perclass agreement, and the results were validated in a worldwide clinical setting. The real-time clinical application of this new cleanliness evaluation scale of the upper gastrointestinal tract during EGD could represent a very important tool to standardize the evaluation of mucosal visibility, push endoscopists to obtain excellent visibility and reduce the risk of missing lesions.

Tracks

Related Products

Thumbnail for ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS FOR THE REFERRAL OF LARGE NON-PEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL POLYPS: AN INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS USING A MODIFIED DELPHI PROCESS
ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS FOR THE REFERRAL OF LARGE NON-PEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL POLYPS: AN INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS USING A MODIFIED DELPHI PROCESS
Resection of colorectal polyps has been shown to decrease the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer…
Thumbnail for BENEFITS AND HARMS OF INCORPORATING AI DURING COLONOSCOPY FOR TRAINEES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED LITERATURE
BENEFITS AND HARMS OF INCORPORATING AI DURING COLONOSCOPY FOR TRAINEES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED LITERATURE
INTRODUCTION: Several randomized and real-world studies and meta-analyses have evaluated the benefits and harms of computer aided detection (CADe) in colonoscopy among experienced endoscopists. However, the same for trainee endoscopists remains largely unknown…
Thumbnail for CAP-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION ALLOWS THE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE RESECTION OF ADHERENT DYSPLASTIC LESIONS IN THE SETTING OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A MULTICENTER, RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
CAP-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION ALLOWS THE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE RESECTION OF ADHERENT DYSPLASTIC LESIONS IN THE SETTING OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A MULTICENTER, RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is well established as the primary resection approach for large or complex colon polyps without signs of overt malignancy…
Thumbnail for ADDITIONAL VALUE OF EXPERT CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH ULTRA-LONG BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS IN THE NETHERLANDS: RESULTS OF THE NATIONWIDE BARRETT EXPERT CENTER REGISTRY.
ADDITIONAL VALUE OF EXPERT CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH ULTRA-LONG BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS IN THE NETHERLANDS: RESULTS OF THE NATIONWIDE BARRETT EXPERT CENTER REGISTRY.
The neoplastic progression risk in Barrett’s Esophagus (BE) increases with increasing BE length. Therefore, some guidelines recommend that patients with ultra long-segment BE ≥10cm (ULS-BE) are referred to an expert center, however, recommendations on further management are lacking…