132

SHORT- AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES FOLLOWING BIOLOGIC USE BEFORE NON-CONVENTIONAL STRICUREPLASTY FOR CROHN’S JEJUNOILEITIS

Date
May 18, 2024
Explore related products in the following collection:

Background
Non-conventional strictureplasties, specifically the Finney and Michelassi techniques, are bowel-preserving surgeries for treating diffuse jejunoileal Crohn’s Disease (CD). We investigated the use of biologics during non-conventional strictureplasty for Crohn’s jejunoileitis and the association with short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with CD who underwent non-conventional strictureplasty at our center, such as side-to-side antiperistaltic strictureplasty (SSAS) according to the Finney technique, and side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty (SSIS) according to the Michelassi technique, from January 2000 to October 2022. Patients were categorized into BIO and NoBIO groups based on whether they were treated with biologics at the time of surgery or not. Our outcomes of interest were: (a) 30-day complications; (b) surgical recurrence. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.3.1.

Results
A total of 71 patients underwent non-conventional strictureplasty: 80 SSAS and 14 SSIS. In the BIO group, 17 (24%) patients underwent surgery, with 15 receiving SSAS and 3 receiving SSIS Most patients (69%) also underwent a concurrent Heineke-Mikulicz strictureplasty or a concurrent small bowel resection (74.6%). The patients in the BIO and NoBIO groups had similar baseline characteristics (Table 1). No difference was observed when comparing surgical recurrence rates (rate 52.9% vs. rate 48.1%, p=0.95), but a longer median time to recurrence was observed in the BIO group (4.7 vs. 4.4 years, p=0.004). (Table 2).

Conclusion
The use of biologics at the time of non-conventional strictureplasty for diffuse jejunoileal Crohn’s disease appears to be safe and is associated with a longer median time to recurrence.

Tracks

Related Products

Thumbnail for IMPACT OF END-ILEOSTOMY VERSUS ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS ON GRAFT-SURVIVAL FOLLOWING LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS
IMPACT OF END-ILEOSTOMY VERSUS ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS ON GRAFT-SURVIVAL FOLLOWING LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS
IBD-PSC patients may require both liver transplantation and ileoanal pouch (IPAA) construction…
Thumbnail for IMPACT OF POUCH LEAKS ON QUALITY OF LIFE AND SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS AFTER ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS SURGERY
IMPACT OF POUCH LEAKS ON QUALITY OF LIFE AND SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS AFTER ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS SURGERY
INTRODUCTION: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice in patients requiring total proctocolectomy. The reported leak rates after IPAA surgery range from 1-12% with well described significant impact on postoperative morbidity and recovery…
Thumbnail for ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES AFTER POUCH EXCISION: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IBD AND FAP POUCH NEOPLASIA?
ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES AFTER POUCH EXCISION: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IBD AND FAP POUCH NEOPLASIA?
Ileoanal pouch patients are at risk of neoplasia of the rectal cuff/anal transitional zone (ATZ) and the pouch, but it is unknown whether underlying diagnosis that impacted pouch construction affects oncologic outcomes after pouch excision…
Thumbnail for MESENTERIC LENGTHENING TECHNIQUES FOR ILEOANAL POUCH CONSTRUCTION: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE POUCH WON'T REACH
MESENTERIC LENGTHENING TECHNIQUES FOR ILEOANAL POUCH CONSTRUCTION: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE POUCH WON'T REACH
During ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), difficulty in reaching the pelvic floor and excess mesenteric tension on the pouch are technical challenges that surgeons must overcome, and excess tension may be associated with increased anastomotic leak rates…