572

REDUCTION OF DISPARITIES IN H. PYLORI TREATMENT AND ERADICATION FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TREATMENT PROGRAM.

Date
May 19, 2024

Background: Worldwide, Helicobacter pylori (HP) remains one of the most frequent etiologies of gastric cancer, peptic ulcer disease, and gastritis. Following major changes in the standard of care, reflected in the American College of Gastroenterology HP Guidelines, our institution implemented in July 2018 a Multidisciplinary Treatment Program for HP (MTPHP) within the Division of Gastroenterology.
Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients with histopathological confirmed HP at our institution between October 2016 and July 2022. Two physicians individually collected patient-level data from the EMR, and a full-dataset analysis was done. We used Pearson χ2 and Fisher’s methods, as appropriate, to test for unadjusted differences of proportion. Subsequently, a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for patient race/ethnicity and language preference was utilized.
Results: During the study period 1002 had histologically confirmed HP of which 386 (38.52%) were enrolled part in the MTPHP, and 616 (61.48%) were not. A significant change was observed following implementation of the MTPHP in: (1) the global treatment rates improved from (79.1% v. 98.7%, p<0.0001), (2) follow-up testing rates (35.06% v. 51.81%, p<0.0001), and (3) eradication success rates (81.19% v. 95.45%, p=0.000008). Outcomes by race/ethnicity had considerable improvement within the MTPHP. Post-implementation eradication success amongst these groups met the international quality benchmark of ≥90% (Figure 1). Our multivariable models showed the effect of the MTPHP was robust to the effects of the covariates.
Conclusions: The MTPHP improved clinical outcomes and decreased racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes observed pre-implementation. The MTPHP was associated with eradication success regardless of treatment choice, race/ethnicity, or preferred language. (Figure 2.)
This demonstrates that overall positive clinical benchmarks can benefit from the implementation of a structured multidisciplinary program.

Tracks

Related Products

Thumbnail for NEW CANCER DIAGNOSES AMONG PATIENTS WITH IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA
NEW CANCER DIAGNOSES AMONG PATIENTS WITH IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA
Patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are more likely than the general population to have an underlying gastrointestinal malignancy, with prior literature suggesting 8.9% have a lower gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy found by colonoscopy and 2…
Thumbnail for EPIDEMIOLOGICAL TRENDS IN <i>HELICOBACTER PYLORI</i> ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN A PEDIATRIC POPULATION OF THE NEW ENGLAND REGION OF THE UNITED STATES
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL TRENDS IN <i>HELICOBACTER PYLORI</i> ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN A PEDIATRIC POPULATION OF THE NEW ENGLAND REGION OF THE UNITED STATES
BACKGROUND: The low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol (FODMAP) diet, which restricts FODMAP intake, currently is used as a treatment for pain-related disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI)…
Thumbnail for META-ANALYSIS OF DYE-SPRAYING CHROMOENDOSCOPY COMPARED WITH HIGH DEFINITION WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE-RELATED COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING
META-ANALYSIS OF DYE-SPRAYING CHROMOENDOSCOPY COMPARED WITH HIGH DEFINITION WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE-RELATED COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING
Colonoscopy surveillance intervals are based on the predicted risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) after polyp removal. Due to the presence of co-existent findings at baseline colonoscopy, risk estimation per specific polyp subtype is difficult…
Thumbnail for SHOULD ELECTRONIC AND DYE-BASED CHROMOSCOPY REPLACE WHITE-LIGHT COLONOSCOPY AND RANDOM BIOPSIES FOR DYSPLASIA DETECTION IN PATIENTS WITH IBD: NO
SHOULD ELECTRONIC AND DYE-BASED CHROMOSCOPY REPLACE WHITE-LIGHT COLONOSCOPY AND RANDOM BIOPSIES FOR DYSPLASIA DETECTION IN PATIENTS WITH IBD: NO
This annual session will provide DDW attendees the opportunity to hear opposing viewpoints from leading GI experts on the most challenging issues in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, in a debate format…