501
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A CLOUD-BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS (CADX) SYSTEM IN NON-EXPERT ENDOSCOPISTS
Date
May 19, 2024
Background
Non-expert endoscopists’ optical diagnosis (OD) of colorectal polyps falls short of ‘resect and discard’ and ‘diagnose and leave’ thresholds. Previous CADx studies are limited to locally deployed hardware AI systems and are mainly evaluated in expert endoscopists. CADDIE is a cloud-based CADx system that receives the live image stream from the endoscopy screen via the hospital’s internet network, where the AI algorithm processes the images and outputs its diagnosis (adenoma, non-adenoma or uncertain) on the endoscopy screen.
We aimed to assess the performance of the real-time cloud-based CADDIE system when colonoscopy is undertaken by non-expert endoscopists (adenoma detection rate below 30%).
Methods
We enrolled 739 patients between April 2021 - Dec 2022, scoped by 32 endoscopists in 9 UK hospitals. Each endoscopist was limited to a maximum of 60 procedures and required to perform more than 20% of this target. Patients were block randomised in a 1:1 ratio to standard of care (SOC) or intervention (CADDIE), stratified by endoscopist and indication. OD accuracy of humans alone (SOC arm) and humans aided by CADDIE (CADDIE arm) were compared to the CADDIE system’s stand-alone performance in the CADDIE arm.
Results
There were 615 evaluable patients after exclusions as pre-defined in the study protocol. There were 523 eligible polyps (270 SOC arm, 253 CADDIE arm). The CADDIE system diagnosed 17.8% of polyps (45/253) as “uncertain”.
Human alone (SOC) OD accuracy was 75.9%, human OD aided by CADDIE was 80.2%, whilst the stand-alone CADDIE system was significantly higher than both at 87.5% (p=0.005 and p=0.04,respectively). Similarly, in the sub-analysis of small/diminutive polyps (≤10mm), human alone OD accuracy was 73.8%, human OD aided by CADDIE was 79.0%, whilst the CADDIE system was significantly higher than both at 87.9% (p=0.001 and p=0.02). Although results were not significant for diminutive polyps (≤5mm), the trend was towards higher accuracy in the CADDIE system (86.6%) compared to humans alone (78.1%; p=0.011) and human OD aided by CADDIE (77.3%;p=0.05).
In sub-analyses of high-confidence (HC) OD, the CADDIE system’s accuracy for ≤10mm polyps was significantly higher (87.9%) than humans alone (78.4%;p=0.04), with no difference to humans aided by CADDIE (83.3%;p=0.18). For HC OD of ≤5mm polyps, where the sample size is smaller, the CADDIE system’s accuracy was higher (86.6%) but not significant to humans alone (82.7%,p=0.46) and humans aided by CADDIE (81.4%,p=0.28).
The OD-derived colonoscopy surveillance interval accuracy was 87.2% in humans alone, 86.8% in humans aided by CADDIE and 90.9% for the CADDIE system.
Discussion
We demonstrate proof of concept and robust results for a cloud-based CADx system. Further research is warranted in the human-computer interaction to optimise non-expert endoscopists’ OD performance to that of CADx systems.
Non-expert endoscopists’ optical diagnosis (OD) of colorectal polyps falls short of ‘resect and discard’ and ‘diagnose and leave’ thresholds. Previous CADx studies are limited to locally deployed hardware AI systems and are mainly evaluated in expert endoscopists. CADDIE is a cloud-based CADx system that receives the live image stream from the endoscopy screen via the hospital’s internet network, where the AI algorithm processes the images and outputs its diagnosis (adenoma, non-adenoma or uncertain) on the endoscopy screen.
We aimed to assess the performance of the real-time cloud-based CADDIE system when colonoscopy is undertaken by non-expert endoscopists (adenoma detection rate below 30%).
Methods
We enrolled 739 patients between April 2021 - Dec 2022, scoped by 32 endoscopists in 9 UK hospitals. Each endoscopist was limited to a maximum of 60 procedures and required to perform more than 20% of this target. Patients were block randomised in a 1:1 ratio to standard of care (SOC) or intervention (CADDIE), stratified by endoscopist and indication. OD accuracy of humans alone (SOC arm) and humans aided by CADDIE (CADDIE arm) were compared to the CADDIE system’s stand-alone performance in the CADDIE arm.
Results
There were 615 evaluable patients after exclusions as pre-defined in the study protocol. There were 523 eligible polyps (270 SOC arm, 253 CADDIE arm). The CADDIE system diagnosed 17.8% of polyps (45/253) as “uncertain”.
Human alone (SOC) OD accuracy was 75.9%, human OD aided by CADDIE was 80.2%, whilst the stand-alone CADDIE system was significantly higher than both at 87.5% (p=0.005 and p=0.04,respectively). Similarly, in the sub-analysis of small/diminutive polyps (≤10mm), human alone OD accuracy was 73.8%, human OD aided by CADDIE was 79.0%, whilst the CADDIE system was significantly higher than both at 87.9% (p=0.001 and p=0.02). Although results were not significant for diminutive polyps (≤5mm), the trend was towards higher accuracy in the CADDIE system (86.6%) compared to humans alone (78.1%; p=0.011) and human OD aided by CADDIE (77.3%;p=0.05).
In sub-analyses of high-confidence (HC) OD, the CADDIE system’s accuracy for ≤10mm polyps was significantly higher (87.9%) than humans alone (78.4%;p=0.04), with no difference to humans aided by CADDIE (83.3%;p=0.18). For HC OD of ≤5mm polyps, where the sample size is smaller, the CADDIE system’s accuracy was higher (86.6%) but not significant to humans alone (82.7%,p=0.46) and humans aided by CADDIE (81.4%,p=0.28).
The OD-derived colonoscopy surveillance interval accuracy was 87.2% in humans alone, 86.8% in humans aided by CADDIE and 90.9% for the CADDIE system.
Discussion
We demonstrate proof of concept and robust results for a cloud-based CADx system. Further research is warranted in the human-computer interaction to optimise non-expert endoscopists’ OD performance to that of CADx systems.
Table 1
Tracks
Related Products
MITOTIC AGE OF NON-DYSPLASTIC BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS DEFINES RISK OF PROGRESSION TO ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA USING A NOVEL TARGETED ALLELE SPECIFIC METHYLATION SEQUENCING ARRAY
Introduction: Shifts towards high-fat, low-fiber diets, may contribute to the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). In mice high-fat diet promotes EAC, possibly through effects on the gut microbiome and the systemic bile acid pool…
