The accreditors of this session require that you periodically check in to verify that you are still attentive.
Please click the button below to indicate that you are.
747
PREDICTING THE NEED FOR STEP-UP AFTER EUS-GUIDED DRAINAGE OF PERIPANCREATIC FLUID COLLECTIONS, INCLUDING QNI SCORE VALIDATION: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Date
May 20, 2024
Background: Despite EUS-guided drainage (EUS-FCD) is the preferred modality for management of peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), factors predicting the need for step-up to additional procedures (including radiology, surgery or additional endoscopies) are retrospectively explored in studies restricted to Lumen Apposing Metal Stents (LAMS) or excluding pseudocysts and post-surgical collections, which might require a step-up as well.
Methods: All consecutive candidates to EUS-FCD with either LAMS or Double-pigtail Plastic Stents (DPPS) between 2020-2023 were included in a Prospective Registry of Therapeutic EUS (PROTECT). The role of baseline clinical and morphological factors, including the Quadrant / Necrosis / Infection (QNI) score, in predicting the need for any step-up to additional procedures was evaluated by stepwise logistic regression.
Results: Twenty-three post-surgical PFCs, 19 pseudocysts and 18 walled-off necrosis [WOPN]) were included, 42% treated with LAMS and 58% with DPPS based on morphology. Clinical success was 92.9%, but 38% of patients required a step-up to necrosectomy (26.7%) or additional procedures. Patients requiring step-up versus those sufficing drainage had a higher number of quadrants involved (OR=3.6 [1.5-8.4]), a more frequent paracolic gutter extension (OR=6 [1.4-26]), a higher necrosis content (>30%, OR=7.2 [1.8-28.4] ; >60% OR=25.2 [4.2-153]) and were in the high-risk group according to the QNI score, with no difference in the diameter and rate of infection. At multivariate analysis, being in the high-risk QNI group was the only independent predictor of step-up (OR=9.8 [2.9-32.9]). The score however was not able to stratify in analyses restricted to WOPN only or LAMS only. High-risk QNI patients presented also a longer hospital stay (17.5 [8-45] vs 4 [2-6.5], p=0,001), without any difference in ICU stay and nutritional support.
Conclusions: In this prospective series of consecutive non-selective PFCs undergoing EUS-FCD, QNI score was the only independent predictor of any need for step-up to additional procedures, and strongly correlated to the EUS-FCD allocation to LAMS versus DPPS, unravelling a potential additional utility.
Two main reasons for a failed EUS- guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HG) are, inability to access the bile ducts due to non-dilated intrahepatic ducts (IHD), and failure of tract dilation due to cirrhosis/ductal scarring or stent passage from misaligned vector forces…
The management of Mirizzi syndrome has been primarily surgical, ranging from cholecystectomy to en-bloc resection with hepatico-jejunostomy for advanced Csendes III and IV types…
CONTRAST ENHANCED HARMONIC EUS-GUIDED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL EUS-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY WITH MACROSCOPIC ON-SITE EVALUATION FOR SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL